Friday, October 17, 2008

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Sarah Silverman for Obama!!

this is just funny

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Tina Fey as Sarah Palin (she is so money)

Screw Wall Street

750 Billion bucks more for a bunch of thieves? And they wonder why American people do not like this deal. I have a couple of ideas for this bail out... not a buy out, a bail out.

Screw Wall Street, take those 750 billion bucks and give it to the people, every adult gets the same amount, the poor, the middle class and the rich. Let the people decide where the money should receive the money. besides that will help everybody pay their mortgages and will save the stripping and gambling industries in 14 hours.

You don't like that? Fine, let's bail out Wall Street under these conditions.
a-If your company is bailed out, no one in the board of directors can get a bonus until the money is repaid.

b-If your company is bailed out, no one, I repeat, no one in the board of directors can make more than the one person in the entire company that makes the least money. I am sure that if they run into a little trouble they can sell their boats, mansions, and Porshes. If they can't get by with that money after they sell their stuff then let them file for bankruptcy like everybody else.

c-Accountability, if you get bailed out, because you have been screwing Joe Public, then you get a new place with a few bars overlooking the prison's laundry room. If you get bailed out but your company was simply a victim of other companies that screwed the economy this does not apply

d-Once your company has paid their debt to tax payers and society, no one in the board of directors can make more than 20 times as much as your least paid employee, for life. Unless of course your company is privately owned in which case you can do with it what ever you want.

Those are my rules for the bail out, I am sure both conservatives and republicans which are not politicians or board members will agree will work. Hey if you did not get bailed out you can do what ever you want. These rules apply to the bunch of thieves that the government wants to save.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

POLITICS: ‘Uppity’ term sparks memories of racism


POLITICS: ‘Uppity’ term sparks memories of racism

For the Journal-Constitution

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Most people who were born and raised in the South know the rest of the phrase Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.) was using when he recently referred to Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, as elitist and “uppity.”

The phrase “uppity (N-word)” was used to let a black person know he was out of his “place.”

It was used on black people during the civil rights movement, who refused to give up seats on buses and who moved into segregated neighborhoods, as well as black people who used proper English. It was likely the last phrase heard by freedom riders in Mississippi before they were killed and buried in an earthen dam.

And it was the phrase I heard one day during the 1960s in southwest Atlanta when my grandmother became one of the first black families to move into what was then a predominantly white neighborhood.

While walking up Lynhurst Drive, I was surrounded by a group of white kids who decided to call me and a friend “uppity” because of our Catholic school uniforms.

We ran and were subsequently chased —- running from the words being hurled at us.

“Uppity … who do you think you are?”

“This is our neighborhood!”

Westmoreland is no better than his black counterparts who refer to young blacks who use proper English and make good grades as “trying to be white.”

Between those two factions it is very hard for young blacks, especially males, to defy the odds and move away from the vernacular and culture that make them sound and dress like 20th century slaves.

They are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Westmoreland, and others like him, will then decry them as lazy and unwilling to work and achieve.

My question for Westmoreland is: How many times have you been called out for referring to a white person as “uppity?”

J.W. Wood lives in Plametto and works for the city of Atlanta.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Palin, How the Media is Giving her a Free Pass


The McCain campaign has taken a 3 point lead in the Gallup poll, mostly because of two things. The convention bump and conservative excitement over Sarah Palin. As an outsider I can tell why the selection of Palin has actually worked. The country does not yet know who she is. And it may remain like that for a while.


The McCain camp has refused to expose her to actual media interviews, so Palin has not had to answer any real questions. Her claims have gone mostly unchallenged in the news networks. The McCain campaign has actually succeeded in putting the Media in the defensive, with claims of sexism. These claims are of course bullshit.


What the media started doing was trying to get to know Palin, and when questions were asked they were told that was sexism and they backed off. The same way that the media backed off when they were told we were invading Iraq. What people in the media fail to realize is that digging for the truth (which is their job) is not sexism. Giving her special consideration is.


Are you saying that Sarah Palin must be granted a certain level of protection because she is a woman? Is that really what feminist would tell us?


Yesterday Joe Biden appeared in Meet the Press. He opened himself to tough questions, why can't Sarah Palin try and do the same? Right now as we speak they are teaching her everything they think she needs to know, and how to avoid questions that she does not know the answer to. Will the media when they finally get to her recognize that? Or will they just roll over as they have been doing lately?


Let's face it, the media has become lazy, they sit back and wait for talking points from the campaign. They repeat what the campaign says, but hardly ever challenge it. Edward R Murrow must be turning in his grave.


IMHO what the media needs to realize is that the truth does not have two sides. More often than not, the truth is not "fair and balanced". Investigative reporters who have worked throughout history have not found out the truth then publish the other side of the story as if somehow the truth and the talking points are at the same level. It is different to give Sarah Palin a chance to defend her record, than it is to give her side of the story.


It is time for the media to go back to the 60's when we had reporters who put the truth first.




Thursday, September 4, 2008

Attacks, praise stretch truth at GOP convention



By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 3, 11:48 PM ET


ST. PAUL, Minn. - Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her Republican supporters held back little Wednesday as they issued dismissive attacks on Barack Obama and flattering praise on her credentials to be vice president. In some cases, the reproach and the praise stretched the truth.


Some examples:

PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."
THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."
THE FACTS: Compared to McCain and his two decades in the Senate, Obama does have a more meager record. But he has worked with Republicans to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year. To demean that accomplishment would be to also demean the work of Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, a respected foreign policy voice in the Senate. In Illinois, he was the leader on two big, contentious measures in Illinois: studying racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death penalty cases. He also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.

PALIN: "The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment income taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars."
THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama's plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly $2,200 annually. McCain's plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded.
Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families.
He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.

MCCAIN: "She's been governor of our largest state, in charge of 20 percent of America's energy supply ... She's responsible for 20 percent of the nation's energy supply. I'm entertained by the comparison and I hope we can keep making that comparison that running a political campaign is somehow comparable to being the executive of the largest state in America," he said in an interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson.
THE FACTS: McCain's phrasing exaggerates both claims. Palin is governor of a state that ranks second nationally in crude oil production, but she's no more "responsible" for that resource than President Bush was when he was governor of Texas, another oil-producing state. In fact, her primary power is the ability to tax oil, which she did in concert with the Alaska Legislature. And where Alaska is the largest state in America, McCain could as easily have called it the 47th largest state — by population.

MCCAIN: "She's the commander of the Alaska National Guard. ... She has been in charge, and she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities," he said on ABC.
THE FACTS: While governors are in charge of their state guard units, that authority ends whenever those units are called to actual military service. When guard units are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they assume those duties under "federal status," which means they report to the Defense Department, not their governors. Alaska's national guard units have a total of about 4,200 personnel, among the smallest of state guard organizations.

FORMER ARKANSAS GOV. MIKE HUCKABEE: Palin "got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States."
THE FACTS: A whopper. Palin got 616 votes in the 1996 mayor's election, and got 909 in her 1999 re-election race, for a total of 1,525. Biden dropped out of the race after the Iowa caucuses, but he still got 76,165 votes in 23 states and the District of Columbia where he was on the ballot during the 2008 presidential primaries.

FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOV. MITT ROMNEY: "We need change, all right — change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington — throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin."
THE FACTS: A Back-to-the-Future moment. George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, has been president for nearly eight years. And until last year, Republicans controlled Congress. Only since January 2007 have Democrats have been in charge of the House and Senate.
___
Associated Press Writer Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report.

What do Republicans really think about Sarah Palin's selection

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

KARL ROVE SLAMS MCCAIN ON PALIN VP PICK

wait isn't Richmond bigger than Wasilla?

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

CNN: Tucker Bounds Can't give One Example of Palin's Foreign Policy Experience

Poor Tucker, he tries to pull out the experience card and it is thrown right back to his face
lol

Scarborough and Buchanan react to Palin selection

Hypocresy of the right


Man, are the conservatives angry about the attention Bristol Palin has received. I will be the first to say, that this would be a private matter if it weren't because the GOP claims to be the (large) family values party.


I do not remember any of them being offended when John McCain himself in June of 1998 made jokes about Chelsea Clinton. In fact I remember all right wing radio jumping on it, repeating the joke and creating new ones. At least the comments have come from bloggers and not from Barack Obama himself.


Let's ask another question for the sake of arguments. If the shoe was on the other foot, if it were Barack Obama's daughter on the same situation that Bristol Palin is in right now, what would right wing bloggers and radio say? Do you think for one second that they would not be using this as a tool to discredit Barack Obama? I can hear them already "doesn't he say that parents should be responsible for their kids?"


I want you to understand something. The reason why some bloggers including myself are reporting this is NOT to make fun of Bristol. We in fact wish her the best. We do point out though the stands Sarah Palin has taken. She believes that we should not give proper sex education, instead we should teach abstinence only. Well if she can't get that to work in her own house, how will she get it to work in everyone else's? And if she can't convince her own family to get with the program, how will she get Iran and Russia to cooperate should she become president?


These are important questions, the best argument that I have heard for her national security experience is that Alaska is close to Russia (see the Cindy McCain video on a previous post). The fact that John McCain selected her shows the kind of rash decisions he would make as commander in chief. IMHO after telling us how dangerous the world is, to chose Sarah Palin as a running mate not only shows the terrible judgment John McCain is capable of, but it also shows that the whole "I put America first" argument that John McCain likes to throw around is nothing but crap.


He did not chose Sarah Palin to be the running mate because she was the most qualified person he could find. I hear a lot of right wing bloggers say that she has more executive experience than Obama because she was governor of Alaska. Well if that's the case, she has also more experience than John McCain, is that what they are saying? After all John McCain has never been governor and has 0 executive experience. And how does being a governor ensure that she would be ready to lead as opposed to someone who hasn't. Abraham Lincoln was not a governor, neither was Adams, or Eisenhower, or Kennedy, all regarded as great presidents. On the other hand, George W Bush was a governor of TX and look what good that did the country.

Monday, September 1, 2008

Now this in no Rumor


So the rumor of the 5th baby was proven wrong, and what happens now? Bristol is pregnant. I wonder if Republicans are starting to think that Palin was a horrible decision? I mean i personally have no problem if someone gets pregnant out of wedlock, but the Religious right are very strict about those things.

I am sorry, it is wrong, I know, but I still think it is funny. I mean Sarah Palin advocates abstinence only education, so no sex before marriage... oops. And she wants to tell other kids what they are supposed to do? This is what happens when you teach abstinence only. Apparently sex is way too powerful for that.

I wonder if they are making the guy marry her, because that's one of the things they said first. She will marry the father, does she have to? Does he have to? Well she is a life long member of the NRA so you know Sarah is packing, maybe he does have to.

Today also Sarah palin hired a lawyer to deal with the abuse of power investigation. Somehow I am starting to think the McCain campaign did not ask her every question. Is she the first VP candidate to skip the debate because she will be in jail? hmmm

IMHO Liberals should have fun with this, not with the pregnancy thing, but with the trouble it is creating for the McCain campaign. We wish Bristol the best, and we wish Sarah a lot of chaos from now until November.

Update to the Rumor of Sarah Palin's baby


I have someone from yahoo answers to thank for posting this picture of Sarah Palin pregnant. I guess that helps quiet the lie that Sarah Palin is not the mother of the 5 month old baby. I am now posting the picture, because as I said yesterday, as soon as I found it I would post it.

The wife U.S. Republican John McCain callously left behind


By Sharon Churcher
Published by the Daily Mail newspaper

Now that Hillary Clinton has at last formally withdrawn from the race for the White House, the eyes of America and the world will focus on Barack Obama and his Republican rival Senator John McCain.

While Obama will surely press his credentials as the embodiment of the American dream – a handsome, charismatic young black man who was raised on food stamps by a single mother and who represents his country’s future – McCain will present himself as a selfless, principled war hero whose campaign represents not so much a battle for the presidency of the United States, but a crusade to rescue the nation’s tarnished reputation.

McCain likes to illustrate his moral fibre by referring to his five years as a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam. And to demonstrate his commitment to family values, the 71-year-old former US Navy pilot pays warm tribute to his beautiful blonde wife, Cindy, with whom he has four children.

But there is another Mrs McCain who casts a ghostly shadow over the Senator’s presidential campaign. She is seldom seen and rarely written about, despite being mother to McCain’s three eldest children.

And yet, had events turned out differently, it would be she, rather than Cindy, who would be vying to be First Lady. She is McCain’s first wife, Carol, who was a famous beauty and a successful swimwear model when they married in 1965.

She was the woman McCain dreamed of during his long incarceration and torture in Vietnam’s infamous ‘Hanoi Hilton’ prison and the woman who faithfully stayed at home looking after the children and waiting anxiously for news.

But when McCain returned to America in 1973 to a fanfare of publicity and a handshake from Richard Nixon, he discovered his wife had been disfigured in a terrible car crash three years earlier. Her car had skidded on icy roads into a telegraph pole on Christmas Eve, 1969. Her pelvis and one arm were shattered by the impact and she suffered massive internal injuries.

When Carol was discharged from hospital after six months of life-saving surgery, the prognosis was bleak. In order to save her legs, surgeons

had been forced to cut away huge sections of shattered bone, taking with it her tall, willowy figure. She was confined to a wheelchair and was forced to use a catheter.

Through sheer hard work, Carol learned to walk again. But when John McCain came home from Vietnam, she had gained a lot of weight and bore little resemblance to her old self.

Today, she stands at just 5ft4in and still walks awkwardly, with a pronounced limp. Her body is held together by screws and metal plates and, at 70, her face is worn by wrinkles that speak of decades of silent suffering.

For nearly 30 years, Carol has maintained a dignified silence about the accident, McCain and their divorce. But last week at the bungalow where she now lives at Virginia Beach, a faded seaside resort 200 miles south of Washington, she told The Mail on Sunday how McCain divorced her in 1980 and married Cindy, 18 years his junior and the heir to an Arizona brewing fortune, just one month later.


Carol insists she remains on good terms with her ex-husband, who agreed as part of their divorce settlement to pay her medical costs for life. ‘I have no bitterness,’

she says. ‘My accident is well recorded. I had 23 operations, I am five inches shorter than I used to be and I was in hospital for six months. It was just awful, but it wasn’t the reason for my divorce.

‘My marriage ended because John McCain didn’t want to be 40, he wanted to be 25. You know that happens...it just does.’

Some of McCain’s acquaintances are less forgiving, however. They portray the politician as a self-centred womaniser who effectively abandoned his crippled wife to ‘play the field’. They accuse him of finally settling on Cindy, a former rodeo beauty queen, for financial reasons.

McCain was then earning little more than £25,000 a year as a naval officer, while his new father-in-law, Jim Hensley, was a multi-millionaire who had impeccable political connections.

He first met Carol in the Fifties while he was at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis. He was a privileged, but rebellious scion of one of America’s most distinguished military dynasties – his father and grandfather were both admirals.

But setting out to have a good time, the young McCain hung out with a group of young officers who called themselves the ‘Bad Bunch’.

His primary interest was women and his conquests ranged from a knife-wielding floozy nicknamed ‘Marie, the Flame of Florida’ to a tobacco heiress.

Carol fell into his fast-living world by accident. She escaped a poor upbringing in Philadelphia to become a successful model, married an Annapolis classmate of McCain’s and had two children – Douglas and Andrew – before renewing what one acquaintance calls ‘an old flirtation’ with McCain.

It seems clear she was bowled over by McCain’s attention at a time when he was becoming bored with his playboy lifestyle.

‘He was 28 and ready to settle down and he loved Carol’s children,’ recalled another Annapolis graduate, Robert Timberg, who wrote The Nightingale’s Song, a bestselling biography of McCain and four other graduates of the academy.

The couple married and McCain adopted Carol’s sons. Their daughter, Sidney, was born a year later, but domesticity was clearly beginning

to bore McCain – the couple were regarded as ‘fixtures on the party circuit’ before McCain requested combat duty in Vietnam at the end of 1966.

He was assigned as a bomber pilot on an aircraft carrier in the Gulf of Tonkin.

What follows is the stuff of the McCain legend. He was shot down over Hanoi in October 1967 on his 23rd mission over North Vietnam and was badly beaten by an angry mob when he was pulled, half-drowned from a lake.

Over the next five-and-a-half years in the notorious Hoa Loa Prison he was regularly tortured and mistreated.

It was in 1969 that Carol went to spend the Christmas holiday – her third without McCain – at her parents’ home. After dinner, she left to drop off some presents at a friend’s house.

It wasn’t until some hours later that she was discovered, alone and in terrible pain, next to the wreckage of her car. She had been hurled through the windscreen.

After her first series of life-saving operations, Carol was told she may never walk again, but when doctors said they would try to get word to McCain about her injuries, she refused, insisting: ‘He’s got enough problems, I don’t want to tell him.’

H. Ross Perot, a billionaire Texas businessman, future presidential candidate and advocate of prisoners of war, paid for her medical care.

When McCain – his hair turned prematurely white and his body reduced to little more than a skeleton – was released in March 1973, he told reporters he was overjoyed to see Carol again.

But friends say privately he was ‘appalled’ by the change in her appearance. At first, though, he was kind, assuring her: ‘I don’t look so good myself. It’s fine.’

He bought her a bungalow near the sea in Florida and another former PoW helped him to build a railing so she could pull herself over the dunes to the water.

‘I thought, of course, we would live happily ever after,’ says Carol. But as a war hero, McCain was moving in ever-more elevated circles.

Through Ross Perot, he met Ronald Reagan, then Governor of California. A sympathetic Nancy Reagan took Carol under her wing.

But already the McCains’ marriage had begun to fray. ‘John started carousing and running around with women,’ said Robert Timberg.

McCain has acknowledged that he had girlfriends during this time, without going into details. Some friends blame his dissatisfaction with Carol, but others give some credence to her theory of a mid-life crisis.

He was also fiercely ambitious, but it was clear he would never become an admiral like his illustrious father and grandfather and his thoughts were turning to politics.

In 1979 – while still married to Carol – he met Cindy at a cocktail party in Hawaii. Over the next six months he pursued her, flying around the country to see her. Then he began to push to end his marriage.

Carol and her children were devastated. ‘It was a complete surprise,’ says Nancy Reynolds, a former Reagan aide.

‘They never displayed any difficulties between themselves. I know the Reagans were quite shocked because they loved and respected both Carol and John.’

Another friend added: ‘Carol didn’t fight him. She felt her infirmity made her an impediment to him. She justified his actions because of all he had gone through. She used to say, “He just wants to make up for lost time.”’

Indeed, to many in their circle the saddest part of the break-up was Carol’s decision to resign herself to losing a man she says she still adores.

Friends confirm she has remained friends with McCain and backed him in all his campaigns. ‘He was very generous to her in the divorce but of course he could afford to be, since he was marrying Cindy,’ one observed.

McCain transferred the Florida beach house to Carol and gave her the right to live in their jointly-owned townhouse in the Washington suburb of Alexandria. He also agreed to pay her alimony and child support.

A former neighbour says she subsequently sold up in Florida and Washington and moved in 2003 to Virginia Beach. He said: ‘My impression was that she found the new place easier to manage as she still has some difficulties walking.’

Meanwhile McCain moved to Arizona with his new bride immediately after their 1980 marriage. There, his new father-in-law gave him a job and introduced him to local businessmen and political powerbrokers who would smooth his passage to Washington via the House of Representatives and Senate.

And yet despite his popularity as a politician, there are those who won’t forget his treatment of his first wife.

Ted Sampley, who fought with US Special Forces in Vietnam and is now a leading campaigner for veterans’ rights, said: ‘I have been following John McCain’s career for nearly 20 years. I know him personally. There is something wrong with this guy and let me tell you what it is – deceit.

‘When he came home and saw that Carol was not the beauty he left behind, he started running around on her almost right away. Everybody around him knew it.

‘Eventually he met Cindy and she was young and beautiful and very wealthy. At that point McCain just dumped Carol for something he thought was better.

‘This is a guy who makes such a big deal about his character. He has no character. He is a fake. If there was any character in that first marriage, it all belonged to Carol.’

One old friend of the McCains said: ‘Carol always insists she is not bitter, but I think that’s a defence mechanism. She also feels deeply in his debt because in return for her agreement to a divorce, he promised to pay for her medical care for the rest of her life.’

Carol remained resolutely loyal as McCain’s political star rose. She says she agreed to talk to The Mail on Sunday only because she wanted to publicise her support for the man who abandoned her.

Indeed, the old Mercedes that she uses to run errands displays both a disabled badge and a sticker encouraging people to vote for her ex-husband. ‘He’s a good guy,’ she assured us. ‘We are still good friends. He is the best man for president.’

But Ross Perot, who paid her medical bills all those years ago, now believes that both Carol McCain and the American people have been taken in by a man who is unusually slick and cruel – even by the standards of modern politics.

‘McCain is the classic opportunist. He’s always reaching for attention and glory,’ he said.

‘After he came home, Carol walked with a limp. So he threw her over for a poster girl with big money from Arizona. And the rest is history.’


  • Additional reporting by Paul Henderson in Virginia Beach and William Lowther in Washington




Cindy McCain Claims Palin Has National Security Experience

Is this the stupidest thing you have ever heard? I mean, that's like saying "I live close to Georgetown University, so I must be a lawyer"

IMHO she just went from potential first lady to potential first bimbo

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Did Republicans Pray for Gustav?


The Republicans must be thrilled about the possibility of Gustav hitting the main land. They get to keep George W. Bush away from their convention. I mean did you really think republicans wanted to remind people of the failures of the current administration? The proof of that is that Dick Cheney is not even showing up. I mean what is Cheney's excuse?

The fact is that any descent group of people would suspend their party. What kind of image will that send? While people lose their homes and have their property destroyed, they are partying in St Paul?

IMHO I think that the funniest thing is that all those republicans that prayed for rain during the Obama acceptance speech, are now getting a hurricane during their own convention. I guess they can forget about that silly idea that heaven is a red state.

Rumor: Sarah palin is not the mother but the grandmother of Trig Palin


So I never go with rumors, in fact when someone mentioned it to me I went on line to try to prove it wrong. I have failed. I am keeping up with the investigation of this rumor. However I must say that at this point what I have found seems to point to this rumor being true.

Let's think like an investigator shall we? The picture on the left by Brian Wallace was taken on Super Tuesday, 1 month before baby Trig was born. Does she look like she is a month away from giving birth? She is also pro life and against contraception, her view is Abstinence only. During that TX conference, she left early and went all the way to Alaska to give birth, all the way from Texas. If you are pregnant and your water breaks are you seriously going to tell me that you are gonna go to the airport, wait at least an hour in there while you are checked in, and wait for your flight to leave and take an 8 hour flight just so you can go to Alaska to give birth?

Airlines have specific policies when it comes to traveling during pregnancy, even more so during the final months. A “permission-to-travel” letter is required fror women traveling in the final month of pregnancy by her primary physician. So that would have also take more time. “Governor Palin was extremely pleasant to flight attendants and her stage of pregnancy was not apparent by observation as she didn’t show any signs of distress,” said Caroline Boren from Alaska Airlines to the Newsminer newspaper in Alaska. Also, as we know, baby Trig has down syndrome, and according to Pediatrics.com "about 75% of babies with Down syndrome are born to younger women", however that is because more younger women give birth than older women.

This link is to a pic dated only 2007 where Bristol (on the right) appears to have a baby lump http://gov.state.ak.us/photos/PalinFamily_Outside_v01.jpg

IMHO something smells fishy, but I am not ready to say the rumor is true. Just so you know, I am on the case.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Sarah Palin didn't know VP job 2 months ago

ok so McCain picked someone who does not know the job

McCain must think women are stupid

Sen McCain must think women are stupid. Does he really think that women will vote for him just because there is a woman in the ticket? The fact that Gov Palin is a woman means nothing. It doesn't erase the fact that he has voted against same pay for same work. It doesn't change the fact that he wants to take a woman's right to chose away. It means nothing.

Women I have spoken to were not voting for Hillary Clinton because she was a woman, they were voting for her because she was the RIGHT woman. Sarah Palin may want to draw similarities to Hillary Clinton, but Governor, you are not Hillary Clinton. So don't give yourself more credit than you deserve.

McCain has said several times that he puts country first, well with this pick, he put his 73 year old foot in his 73 year old mouth. What if he becomes president and something were to happen to him. Is he really going to tell us that someone he spoke to once before is good enough to trust with the most important job in the world? There were more qualified republican women and yet he chose the former model. Just like his first wife, just like his mistress then second wife. Now he has another model as a partner in the white house?

This proves that his judgment is questionable. I don't like Mitt Romney, but there is no way that Gov Palin is more qualified than him. I don't like Kay Bailey Hutchinson (if he needed a woman in the ticket) but there is no way that Palin is more qualified. And what about poor Charlie Crist? He married for nothing?

IMHO selecting Gov Palin is a sad example of the opinion McCain has of women. No wonder he thinks they should make less money, he thinks women are stupid.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Time for the Obama bashers on Hill camp to get with the Program


Alright PUMAs, I've had it with your crap, and since no one else seems to be calling you on it I will. There are a few reasons you would have supported Hillary Clinton in the primaries. If you were James Carville (pictured here) it is because your paycheck was coming from the Clinton aspirations. we will not deal with that here. The other 3 reasons are message, color of the skin and crotch. Hey if you are offended, I don't care, it is the truth.


If you were with her because of the message, then you are already for Obama. Makes sense, the policies of both Clinton and Obama are very similar, maybe the difference is in the implementation. End of the war, universal health care, better economy, all goals of both campaigns.


Now for the other two. If you voted for the crotch (because she has a vagina) then time to get in line. I guarantee you, John McCain does not have a vagina, even though in this campaign he has been George Bush's bitch. Not only does he not have a vagina, in fact he hates vaginas. He is against choice, has voted for limiting contraceptives, says will appoint judges like Alito and Roberts, opposes equal wages for equal work and voted against health care for children. If for one second you think that McCain cares about women, then read his record and welcome to the Hillary Clinton backers for Obama camp.


If you voted for her because of the color of the skin, then I only have one thing to say to you... What year is it where you live? You have seen 8 years of the worst management this country has ever seen, from jobs, to unemployment, to crisis management, to foreign policy. 72 percent of Americans think the country is going in the wrong direction and yet you want to live it there, because a long time ago slavery and segregation were abolished. Time to fly your American flags and remember what they represent, your love of country. Do you really want to keep the country in the wrong track for at least 4 more years because of your own inability to see past the color of the skin?


I know if you read this you are probably a bit offended and think I should shut up. IMHO it is time for democrats to grow a spine and take the truth head on. The more you avoid reality the harder it will be to change it.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

How can McCain be proud of George W Bush?


John McCain last week said he was proud of President Bush for not allowing any money added on to the economy stimulus package. That sounds reasonable if it not were because it is hard to be proud of this president for anything. Not as a commander in chief, not as a representative of this country, not even as a human being.


One of the points John McCain makes about his "National Security credentials" is that he opposed the Rumsfeld startegy, but that was not Rumsfeld, that was george Bush. it wasn't President Rumsfeld. But McCain is proud that Bush changed strategies, yeah after five years of allowing screw up after screw up. While Bush was allowing all this people who didn't need to die did.


That's why Republicans do not say the current presiden'ts name as much, instead they invoque Ronald Reagan every day and every night. Maybe their buses and planes are all equiped with Ouija bords and a medium. Like Reagan was a good president? Don't make me laugh. IMHO if the democrats do not point this out they will prove once again how yellow they are.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

John Edwards leaves with his head up high


Senator Edwards announced Wednesday that he was leaving the campaign, and although we think it is the right move it does not mean that it does not pain us to see him go. We think he will be around, and we hope he throws his support behind Senator Obama, who is the only candidate left who can bring the change to Washington that Senator Edwards spoke about.


During his campaign, Senator Edwards brought focus to issues that no one did before. He was the first one to offer a real plan for universal healthcare. He spoke for those whom no one else speaks for. The poor, the homeless, the veterans. In a time when everyone says "support the troops" he was the only one to shed light on the thousands of veterans who are homeless today. He understood and spoke of the poor because he was at one point one of them. He is the perfect American Dream. the poor boy from SC who grew up to make a difference.


We hope the Democrats learn from Senator Edwards and keep him in mind when they chose a running mate. IMHO John Edwards still has a lot to offer to this country. Mr Edwards... Thank You.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

How dare the National Organization for Women NY Chapter attack Ted Kennedy


The NOW (National Organization for Women) NY tate chapter, and their President Marcia Pappas are attacking Ted Kennedy for his endorsement of Barak Obama, calling it "the greatest betrayal." Are these Idiots on drugs or something? Ted Kennedy has always supported the bills that favor women. From choice, to women's rights etc. Their biggest complaint is that he was late in supporting "Title IX, the ERA, the Family Leave and Medical Act." He supported it you morons. they complaint that Ted Kennedy voted yes on no child left behind, but vote smart reports that so did Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama has criticized it.


I am angry at NOW New York Chapter and Mrs Pappas. How dare they attack Ted Kennedy? It is time for Marcia Pappas to understand that support for women comes from people from both sexes, as do attacks on women. What ever a person has between their legs does not define character. IMHO Senator Kennedy has been a champion for women, and who he supports for president does not diminish his record. Would you say Caroline Kennedy betrayed women too? or does she get a pass because she is a woman?


I am glad to say though that the President of NOW, Kim Gandy released the following statement "The National Organization for Women has enormous respect and admiration for Sen. Edward Kennedy (D- Mass.). For decades Sen. Kennedy has been a friend of NOW, and a leader and fighter for women's civil and reproductive rights, and his record shows that.
Though the National Organization for Women Political Action Committee has proudly endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president, we respect Sen. Kennedy's endorsement. We continue to encourage women everywhere to express their opinions and exercise their right to vote. "


So I guess stupidity is isolated to the New York chapter of NOW, well maybe it is just Mrs. Pappas


Sunday, January 27, 2008

The White House has lied...935 times!

South Carolina Got the Message



South Caroline got the message. They voted for Barak Obama and not Hillary Clinton. I know Senator Obama was not my first choice, but it is quickly becoming obvious that Senator Edwards will not win this race. So if that makes me a fair weather voter so be it.

There is one thing I can say though. I have never said anything bad about Senator Obama. I think he will be a great president if elected, and would have an easier time getting elected than Hillary. I am not just saying that, I have done some research. I have spoken to many supporters of other candidates who have told me that if Hillary is the nominee they will not vote. I am one of them.

I want to make it clear. I lived in NY the two times Mrs Clinton ran for the US Senate. Both times I supported her, and both times I voted for her. Both times I did my best to get her as many votes as I could. When people called her a carpetbagger, I reminded them of the Clinton years. I also think President Clinton is one of the best presidents this country has ever seen. If there were no term limits I guarantee you he'd get elected again, and I would be happy to support him.

But the Clinton campaign has run such divisive campaign this time, there is no way I can see myself voting for her. If she is the nominee, I will be voting for the green party. Maybe pray that Michael Bloomberg decides to run. The way they have attacked Barak Obama is despicable. Have they for one second stop to think "what if Hillary doesn't win? aren't we just giving the republicans some material?"

Now we approach "Super Tuesday", that will be the moment of truth for all candidates. IMHO I think it is time for Senator Edwards to drop out of the race and throw his support to Senator Obama. I hate to say that, because I think Senator Edwards has the most to offer, but if we want change we can't wait until after Super Tuesday.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

I Cant vote for Hillary anymore


I am a democrat, I vote democrat every single time. I vote every time. The only way I will vote democrat in the November election is if Hillary Clinton is not the nomenee. That's right, I cannot bring myself to vote for her, not anymore. When the race started I said to myself I agree with Edwards (I still do), but if he is not the winner I will vote for any democrat. But recent actions by her campaign and the actions of the Former President Clinton have changed my mind. They have acted the way Republicans act, and that is a sure way to wave goodbye to my vote.

I am praying that Hillary will not be the nomenee, because I know I am not alone. I know a lot of people think the same same way. Ip posted the question in Yahoo answers and a few were supportive of Mrs Clinton, the great majority said they would not vote for her in the general. I hope democrat voters wake up and realize this before Super Tuesday. Hillary Clinton will lose against the Republicans in November, do not overlook the Obama and Edwards voters. A lot of us will not vote for her.

John Edwards is still my favorite, he wins every debate and his message is everything every democrat wants to hear. It has nothing to do with race (I am Latino). It has all to do with actions, with sincerity, with hope for the country. He is a fighter who will fight for the ones whom politicians have forgotten, plus he doesn't take special interest money, and that is huge.

Barak Obama is capable, he inspires people. I have heard "he doesn't have the experience." and I say what he doesn't have in experience he makes up in intelligence and sincerity, so he is a great choice too, and I understand it.

Mrs Clinton and her campaign have been too divisive for my taste, in the general election IMHO she will get no more than 35% of the vote. To Democrats I say, do you want to take that chance?