Thursday, December 17, 2009

Just Another Bunch of Spineless Democrats


I want to start by apologizing to you, the reader, for my lack of vision. I fell for it and in the way to the polls I asked you to come with me. I guess when I heard then candidate Obama say at the convention that one word "Enough!", I actually believed him. But after afghanistan, health care, and his timid way around the environment, I have come to a realization. No matter how good a speech is, if you are a Democrat and a politician you are spineless. No way around it. There is no longer a liberal party, just an ultra conservative and a bunch of center/right cowards.

Teddy Kennedy is rolling in his grave. You know what Mr. President? In your misguided attemt at making Joe Lieberman happy you lost a lot of us. Joe Lieberman who did not support you, has your ear a lot more than us, the people who volunteered, who knocked on doors and donated money. Us who believed you would be an exceptional president are now feeling foolish. Your white house is tough on Gov Dean, but would not say an unkind word about Ben Nelson or Joe Lieberman. You fooled us. You gave us hope and then showed us that there is no hope. This country was bought and sold a long time ago.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Catholic Church, don't let the door hit you on the way out

The Catholic Church in DC decided to flex its muscle. They are telling the city council that they will not be able to honor their contracts if DC passes the same sex marriage bill. I say good riddance. Just do what you do when one of your priests molests a boy. Move around, no one will miss ya.

While you are at it, why not sell the real estate you have in the district, maybe use that to feed people in third world countries. Come on Catholics, do what you preach and live humble, like Jesus. The carpenter would have. I am guessing you won't because you are all talk and no real result. Do they understand that they are saying "if we can't discriminate against gay people, then we won't feed the hungry in the district. We won't help put a roof over homeless people's heads, we hate gays that much"?

What would happen if you were planning something and someone else came along and said "my imaginary friend says not to go to that place". Would you take him seriously? No, you would say "shut up crazy." Well Catholic church... shut up crazy.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Rest in Peace Teddy


Ted Kennedy, "The Lion of the Senate". We thank you for all that you did and we will miss you greatly. That is not my humble opinion. That is a fact.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Monday, August 17, 2009

Opinion on Health Care and Townhall Disruptions by Jaime Tejada



If you have been following the developments about health care reform, you may have noticed that groups of people have been disrupting town hall meetings. These groups have been mobilized by the extreme right. Their objective is not to have people voice their opinion. Their objective is to prevent others from having a conversation about the much needed reform. So far, the right is winning the argument simply because the corporate media is both racist and corrupt. The town hall meetings are packed with angry white people who exhibit the most blatant selfish feelings. They claim to be there because they want to rescue America from socialism. As one woman put it, she does not want America to become a socialist country like Russia (Russia is now the prime example of predatory capitalism.) Their ignorance is unbelievable. Their ignorance is precisely the source of their anger and open racism. Recent polls reveal that 70% of white people in the South believe President Obama was not born in the US. They can not stand the fact that the country is changing. They see America's new face and become outraged. They just can not process that America elected and African American President, that there is a Liberal woman as Secretary of State, and a Latina as a Supreme Court Justice. All this seems to be too much for their reactionary minds to accept. Therefore, they are determined to see the "black President" fail. They scream they want their country back. The question is "back from what?" The answer is not from socialism. The answer is they want their country back from the "Black President." There is one more important point that needs to be considered. So far the town hall meeting protesters have been white. They show up in groups of 40 or 50 and disrupt the meetings. The media has of course portrayed them as patriotic citizens exercising their first amendment rights. What would happen if 40 or 50 Black or Latino men showed up to disrupt a town hall meeting. You know the answer well!

HOPELESS!


Where did the hope go? I am writing this today after being absent for a while because I feel betrayed. I worked for this Democratic party. I raised money last year on the streets, and I knocked on doors. I told people that once we had a majority in congress that we would change this country, and then candidate Obama made it clear that we needed change. He asked me and every American to have hope for the future, and I did.

Now, a year after the knocking on doors and raising money for the Democrats I have become an unintentional liar. The health care reform, that was so important back then has been reduced to nothing thanks to a bunch of spineless or otherwise bought out democrats, and a leader who refuses to do just that... lead. We (liberals) wanted a single payer system which in fairness the President never promised, but we were willing to settle for a public option. Something that Mr. Obama said as recently as last month was necessary to keep insurance companies honest. Now due to lies and fake outrage from republicans, the public option seems to be almost out of the picture.

What is the President afraid of? Poll numbers? the reason over 50 percent of people disapprove his handling of health care is because that number includes people like me who think he should be leading. What was the point of voting for a bunch of cowards who would not stand up for the people? Why did we call the republicans corrupt just to replace them with these corrupt democrats? I for one am ready to say this. If there is no public health option in this "health care reform package, then I promise, never, ever, ever to vote for another democrat so long as I live. I think you the reader should do the same. And by that, I do not mean vote republican. I mean stand up and go to another party. The Green party needs people, and the way the democrats are acting we will need a liberal party in this country.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Gay Marriage Recognition in DC: A Step in the Right Direction


The DC Council has taken the first step in the right direction when it comes to gay marriage. Of course recognition is only a first step. Equal rights should be the ultimate goal. Standing in the way of that goal however are former crack head and current tax evader Marion Barry, as well as the National Organization for Marriage (with their new pet, the very topless Carrie Prejean, AKA Miss California, AKA the dumb chick from that Miss USA thing). Oh and a bunch black of churches, more on them later.

Marion Barry has some nerve, he said he is a friend of the gay community. Does he mean like a slave owner is a friend to the slaves because he does not beat them with a rod, but still will not see them as equal? Mr Barry, seeing someone on the street and smiling does not make you their friend. Going to bat for them when they are being ganged up on, even when it is not something that will keep you employed does.

The National Organization for Marriage in their website has a picture of a watch, and the very creative line... that's right, you guessed it "not in my watch". Isn't that what racists in the south used to say about school integration in the 50's and 60's? Then Bimbo in Chief Prejean says her position is not discriminatory... excuse me, but isn't saying that someone can't do something you CAN do because they are different than you the very definition of discrimination? I don't expect Prejean to understand that as it involves thinking... not her forte.

That brings me to the black churches. Those hypocrites, those charlatans. Those people who have felt what discrimination does to an entire community, and now they themselves discriminate. How dare they try to hurt an entire group of people over differences like looks or sexual orientation? Then the cowards hide behind the bible to excuse their own immoral behavior. Did you not read the bible? It condones in fact encourages slavery. Yeah that was wrong, but the gay part... right on. You, the ones that have felt discrimination, have no business discriminating against others. How dare you?

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Miss CA: 'I'm Going To Do Whatever It Takes To Protect Marriage.' Lauer: Some Compare You To Palin

Carrie Prejean, the second place winner in the Miss USA pageant is going all out in what she calls a "non discriminatory position". Miss Prejean, when you tell people that you can do something, while other people can't that is called discrimination. It was the case when black men could not marry white women. That was discrimination as well. Do you not see that you claiming rights and denying it to other people is the same thing that people in the south did when they said black people could not ride in the front of the bus?

Perhaps you are a dumb bimbo after all

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Quit Bugging Michael Phelps

As I have stated in this blog before, I do not smoke weed, I don't even smoke cigarettes. But I seem to be the only one in America who does not give a crap about Phelps smoking it. It is not like it is a performance enhancement drug. If anything he should get another medal, because weed makes you lazy and hungry which makes you fat. Both things which he is not. Maybe Phelps smoking it will be the end of all the pot myths out there.

Legalize it

Friday, October 17, 2008

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Sarah Silverman for Obama!!

this is just funny

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Tina Fey as Sarah Palin (she is so money)

Screw Wall Street

750 Billion bucks more for a bunch of thieves? And they wonder why American people do not like this deal. I have a couple of ideas for this bail out... not a buy out, a bail out.

Screw Wall Street, take those 750 billion bucks and give it to the people, every adult gets the same amount, the poor, the middle class and the rich. Let the people decide where the money should receive the money. besides that will help everybody pay their mortgages and will save the stripping and gambling industries in 14 hours.

You don't like that? Fine, let's bail out Wall Street under these conditions.
a-If your company is bailed out, no one in the board of directors can get a bonus until the money is repaid.

b-If your company is bailed out, no one, I repeat, no one in the board of directors can make more than the one person in the entire company that makes the least money. I am sure that if they run into a little trouble they can sell their boats, mansions, and Porshes. If they can't get by with that money after they sell their stuff then let them file for bankruptcy like everybody else.

c-Accountability, if you get bailed out, because you have been screwing Joe Public, then you get a new place with a few bars overlooking the prison's laundry room. If you get bailed out but your company was simply a victim of other companies that screwed the economy this does not apply

d-Once your company has paid their debt to tax payers and society, no one in the board of directors can make more than 20 times as much as your least paid employee, for life. Unless of course your company is privately owned in which case you can do with it what ever you want.

Those are my rules for the bail out, I am sure both conservatives and republicans which are not politicians or board members will agree will work. Hey if you did not get bailed out you can do what ever you want. These rules apply to the bunch of thieves that the government wants to save.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

POLITICS: ‘Uppity’ term sparks memories of racism


POLITICS: ‘Uppity’ term sparks memories of racism

For the Journal-Constitution

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Most people who were born and raised in the South know the rest of the phrase Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.) was using when he recently referred to Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, as elitist and “uppity.”

The phrase “uppity (N-word)” was used to let a black person know he was out of his “place.”

It was used on black people during the civil rights movement, who refused to give up seats on buses and who moved into segregated neighborhoods, as well as black people who used proper English. It was likely the last phrase heard by freedom riders in Mississippi before they were killed and buried in an earthen dam.

And it was the phrase I heard one day during the 1960s in southwest Atlanta when my grandmother became one of the first black families to move into what was then a predominantly white neighborhood.

While walking up Lynhurst Drive, I was surrounded by a group of white kids who decided to call me and a friend “uppity” because of our Catholic school uniforms.

We ran and were subsequently chased —- running from the words being hurled at us.

“Uppity … who do you think you are?”

“This is our neighborhood!”

Westmoreland is no better than his black counterparts who refer to young blacks who use proper English and make good grades as “trying to be white.”

Between those two factions it is very hard for young blacks, especially males, to defy the odds and move away from the vernacular and culture that make them sound and dress like 20th century slaves.

They are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Westmoreland, and others like him, will then decry them as lazy and unwilling to work and achieve.

My question for Westmoreland is: How many times have you been called out for referring to a white person as “uppity?”

J.W. Wood lives in Plametto and works for the city of Atlanta.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Palin, How the Media is Giving her a Free Pass


The McCain campaign has taken a 3 point lead in the Gallup poll, mostly because of two things. The convention bump and conservative excitement over Sarah Palin. As an outsider I can tell why the selection of Palin has actually worked. The country does not yet know who she is. And it may remain like that for a while.


The McCain camp has refused to expose her to actual media interviews, so Palin has not had to answer any real questions. Her claims have gone mostly unchallenged in the news networks. The McCain campaign has actually succeeded in putting the Media in the defensive, with claims of sexism. These claims are of course bullshit.


What the media started doing was trying to get to know Palin, and when questions were asked they were told that was sexism and they backed off. The same way that the media backed off when they were told we were invading Iraq. What people in the media fail to realize is that digging for the truth (which is their job) is not sexism. Giving her special consideration is.


Are you saying that Sarah Palin must be granted a certain level of protection because she is a woman? Is that really what feminist would tell us?


Yesterday Joe Biden appeared in Meet the Press. He opened himself to tough questions, why can't Sarah Palin try and do the same? Right now as we speak they are teaching her everything they think she needs to know, and how to avoid questions that she does not know the answer to. Will the media when they finally get to her recognize that? Or will they just roll over as they have been doing lately?


Let's face it, the media has become lazy, they sit back and wait for talking points from the campaign. They repeat what the campaign says, but hardly ever challenge it. Edward R Murrow must be turning in his grave.


IMHO what the media needs to realize is that the truth does not have two sides. More often than not, the truth is not "fair and balanced". Investigative reporters who have worked throughout history have not found out the truth then publish the other side of the story as if somehow the truth and the talking points are at the same level. It is different to give Sarah Palin a chance to defend her record, than it is to give her side of the story.


It is time for the media to go back to the 60's when we had reporters who put the truth first.




Thursday, September 4, 2008

Attacks, praise stretch truth at GOP convention



By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 3, 11:48 PM ET


ST. PAUL, Minn. - Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her Republican supporters held back little Wednesday as they issued dismissive attacks on Barack Obama and flattering praise on her credentials to be vice president. In some cases, the reproach and the praise stretched the truth.


Some examples:

PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."
THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."
THE FACTS: Compared to McCain and his two decades in the Senate, Obama does have a more meager record. But he has worked with Republicans to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year. To demean that accomplishment would be to also demean the work of Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, a respected foreign policy voice in the Senate. In Illinois, he was the leader on two big, contentious measures in Illinois: studying racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death penalty cases. He also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.

PALIN: "The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment income taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars."
THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama's plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly $2,200 annually. McCain's plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded.
Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families.
He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.

MCCAIN: "She's been governor of our largest state, in charge of 20 percent of America's energy supply ... She's responsible for 20 percent of the nation's energy supply. I'm entertained by the comparison and I hope we can keep making that comparison that running a political campaign is somehow comparable to being the executive of the largest state in America," he said in an interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson.
THE FACTS: McCain's phrasing exaggerates both claims. Palin is governor of a state that ranks second nationally in crude oil production, but she's no more "responsible" for that resource than President Bush was when he was governor of Texas, another oil-producing state. In fact, her primary power is the ability to tax oil, which she did in concert with the Alaska Legislature. And where Alaska is the largest state in America, McCain could as easily have called it the 47th largest state — by population.

MCCAIN: "She's the commander of the Alaska National Guard. ... She has been in charge, and she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities," he said on ABC.
THE FACTS: While governors are in charge of their state guard units, that authority ends whenever those units are called to actual military service. When guard units are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they assume those duties under "federal status," which means they report to the Defense Department, not their governors. Alaska's national guard units have a total of about 4,200 personnel, among the smallest of state guard organizations.

FORMER ARKANSAS GOV. MIKE HUCKABEE: Palin "got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States."
THE FACTS: A whopper. Palin got 616 votes in the 1996 mayor's election, and got 909 in her 1999 re-election race, for a total of 1,525. Biden dropped out of the race after the Iowa caucuses, but he still got 76,165 votes in 23 states and the District of Columbia where he was on the ballot during the 2008 presidential primaries.

FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOV. MITT ROMNEY: "We need change, all right — change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington — throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin."
THE FACTS: A Back-to-the-Future moment. George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, has been president for nearly eight years. And until last year, Republicans controlled Congress. Only since January 2007 have Democrats have been in charge of the House and Senate.
___
Associated Press Writer Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report.

What do Republicans really think about Sarah Palin's selection